Author Archive

Author: Funyunwolf
• Friday, February 26th, 2010
Does anyone know of any games or stories of a well known Grandmaster losing in a simultaneous chess exhibition? You almost never hear of it happening. @.@
Category: Chess Talk, General Chess Discussion  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Saturday, February 06th, 2010
It is white to move, how can white turn the situation around?
Category: Chess Puzzles, Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Wednesday, January 20th, 2010
This is a game played by Tal (playing white) in a simul game, I thought it was an interesting position that lead to an awesome combination. It's white to move, give it a swing guys! :D Edit:Technically this position can be a mate in four. (Sorry about the mix up, but I fixed the board, the king on e8 was supposed to be black.)
Category: Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Monday, January 18th, 2010
I was wondering, are there any distinct benefits in becoming a FIDE master or a USCF master? I imagine it presents a huge opportunity to bank on giving chess lessons, but other then that what do they do? I'm sure there are many people who are accomplished in their careers who have the time and money to focus on chess to raise to the coveted status of Master, maybe not GM but I'm sure Master is within reach, but with that are there specific perks you get? I remember watching 'True Life I'm a genius' on MTV and they had a chess GM on it and it showed that with international tournaments the GMs and Masters had a special stage aside from the common playing area, but that was it. Ideas?
Category: Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Thursday, January 14th, 2010
While skimming through my newly acquired tactics book this puzzle was presented and explained. I had never heard of a windmill before but once it was explained I was blown away, I had heard of all the common tactics such as pinning and skewering etc, but never of 'windmills' and 'x-rays'. Well anyway this puzzle is from Torre-Em. Emanuel Lasker in Moscow 1925 and it is white to move.

It's hard to believe someone like Lasker could get caught in such a pickle, but anything is possible. :bored:
 click to show
Category: Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Wednesday, January 13th, 2010
As I was studying one of my recently acquired tactics book it presented this crazy puzzle. The chapter theme was about 'the double attack'. I hate when you when see a simple looking puzzle like this when after a bit of assessment you find out it's an oddity to your current experience level and you're forced to have wrangle with it to find the solution. Anyway it's a puzzle composed by Troitzky in 1896.

 click to show
Category: Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
I recently came across a rather interesting checkmate in two puzzle while flipping through the new 2009 revised version of 'Emanuel Lasker's Manual of Chess'. The puzzle is from a game played by Paul Morphy and it's white to move.
Category: Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Monday, January 04th, 2010
Hello all! I have a quick question regarding a variation to Evan's Gambit, to be specific it is a variation by Chigorin. These moves are from 'Modern Chess Openings MC0-13'. The moves go as follows....
1)E4 E5 2)Nf3 Nc6 3)Bc4 Bc5 4)b4 Bxb4 5)c3 Ba5 6)0-0 Nf6 7)d4 Nxe4 8)Nxe5 0-0 9)Ba3 d6 10)Nxc6 bxc6 11)Qa4 Qg5.
From here I have a few questions. After 11)...Qg5 12)Qxc6 what would be an appropriate response for black? There is a fork on the Rook and A1 and the knight on E4. Which is why I did not understand the significance of 11)..Qg5. Ideas?
Category: Chess Openings, Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Sunday, January 03rd, 2010
Hello everyone! I'm making this post one of my first as it is relevant to one of the questions I had intended to ask on this website. Let me begin by stating that I am a beginner in chess and recently I've taken a great rekindled interest in it though I'm finding difficulty on where to take the first steps in the whole torrent of the learning process. For the past month I've trailed through 'Back to Basics, Fundamentals' by Branislav Francuski as well as the majority of the second edition of the 'Chess for Dummies' book. Both were extremely instructive and helpful to get me past the very core basics of Chess and I've just recently begun pushing through '202 Checkmates for Children' by Fred Wilson and Bruce Alberston which have 101 'checkmate in one' and 101 'checkmate in two' puzzles which I've found to be quite helpful and a lot fun solving. All of which have been helpful and obviously helped me improve but what would be the key area to focus on? Tactics, endgame, opening? Before I make a wall of text here I'll end this post in a quote that seems to be the advice of most GMs (well at least their quotes). “In order to improve your game, you must study the endgame before
everything else, for whereas the endings can be studied and
mastered by themselves, the middle game and the opening
must be studied in relation to the endgame” -Jose Raul Capablanca
Category: Beginner's Corner, Chess Talk  | Comments off
Author: Funyunwolf
• Sunday, January 03rd, 2010
Hello everyone! Looking forward to Chess discussions in the forums. :p
Category: Chess Talk, Introductions  | Comments off